Sunday, January 31, 2010

Ryan Hall's Theory of Ideals



Ryan gave a seminar on January 30, 2010. He went over a series. It was a deep half guard entry into a "waiter sweep," followed by a guard pass, into a submission.

But rather than focusing on these specific techniques, Ryan insisted that if we got anything out of the seminar it should be the principles and theories he uses to explain why he chooses these techniques and their specific details.

It's in those principles he uses to explain his techniques that Ryan reveals the various theories and principles he uses to categorize and systematize Jiu Jitsu techniques. He deconstructs each movement, trying to break it down into base elements - a small move of the hips, a placement of a hook, a foot on the floor. In doing so, he highlights the small, simple actions that make Jiu Jitsu an art which has a high efficiency of power and movement.

There is also a very interesting viewpoint he conveyed on the guard. Basically, it is "when I am fighting an opponent, he may have an excellent guard, but I never want to find that out." That is to say, he never wishes to engage his opponent's guard but rather bypass it entirely. In the series he taught at this seminar, what I described above as a "guard pass" was actually a "guard bypass." Why engage your opponent in a position in which he is strong if you don't have to? It is very nearly what I was getting at on a theory I examined in an earlier entry describing that if we define and understand a position, we can defeat more than an opponent, we can defeat the position.



In the times I have met him, he has always advocated a theory of Jiu Jitsu as follows:

If I fight a grappler in all areas superior than me, size, strength and technique, yet I make 100% correct technical choices for movement, I will win. He uses the example of fighting Marcelo Garcia or Rubens "Cobrinha" Charles to highlight this theory. Fighting Marcelo Garcia, no matter what your rank or skill level, if you make flawless movements in the fight, you will defeat Marcelo.

I largely agree with this theory, but we should deconstruct it.

We recognize that we are discussing Jiu Jitsu. We are discussing this theory within the generally accepted rules of Jiu Jitsu. We recognize that grappling is a sport whose equipment is limited to the human body. We make a few assumptions on this equipment. We assume that each body is within a limit of size and strength of the other in order to be able to reasonably manipulate the opponent. We can see that even someone of 130lbs can force some reasonable manipulation against the body of a person of 300lbs. However, it is more difficult to assume that someone with a 40lbs body could reasonably manipulate that 300lbs person in the same way. In Jiu Jitsu, we assume that human forms will be within some sort of tolerated limits, where one person will be able to have some reasonable manipulation over the other person's body.

Apart from this physical limitation, Ryan's theory has three important pieces:

First Assumption, there exists perfect progressions inside the limits of what Jiu Jitsu is.

Second Assumption, while Marcelo Garcia is a superb grappler, and arguably the best technical Jiu Jitsu fighter in the world, he and every other grappler makes technical mistakes so that their game is less than an ideal progression.

Third Assumption, anyone who fights an ideal game will defeat anyone fighting a less than ideal game.


In order to really examine this theory, I would want to deconstruct it further. I'd like to define some of the terms I've used more specifically.
What is it to "reasonably manipulate" an opponent?
What are "progressions" in Jiu Jitsu?
What is a "game" in Jiu Jitsu?
(while we all feel like it is common sense, I would even like to define)
What is it to "win" in Jiu Jitsu?

Friday, January 22, 2010

Explaining Theory



I was just watching this video and it reminded me... last night, I tried to explain the theoretical approach to Jiu Jitsu to one of my fellow literature students. I felt I failed to convey the deeply theoretical aspect of fighting but also that by mentioning the theoretical aspect, I felt I failed to convey how Jiu Jitsu is grounded in reality that was proven in hundreds of MMA events.

My fellow literature student is a fellow theorist. I love the theoretical aspect of Jiu Jitsu because literature has taught me to theorize. It's taught me that theory has changed the face of subjects like art, photography, film, and writing. So can theory change the face of a subject like fighting?

I would argue that it can.

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the various theories of martial arts were opened to each other as an unprecedented era of competition began. I imagine this period like hundreds of individual countries all discovering naval travel at once and opening their markets to trade. The world of martial arts was opened to free trade. Among other arts of striking and grappling, Brazilian Jiu Jitsu proved itself to be one of the martial arts with the most effective theories for this new era.

But what are those theories?

I thought today, perhaps I should have explained my "Theory of Best Move" to show that Jiu Jitsu is a deeply theoretical, yet technical art. That is, "Theory of Best Move" states that any move you employ in a fight should ideally put you closer to finishing your opponent and further from being finished. But to establish that idea, we must define what a move is; we must define what finishing a fight is; and we must define what the opponent is.

"Theory of Best Move" is a very basic theory, but a theory I feel has not been solidified, a theory that has not been made obvious and concrete in the mind of every martial artist eager to learn how to fight.

As I wondered if explaining my "Theory of Best Move" would show that Jiu Jitsu is both theoretical, practical, and technical, I asked myself, what is it to finish a fight? To finish a fight is to render an opponent incapable or unwilling to further engage in combat. In Jiu Jitsu, our aim is to maim a joint so he is demoralized or incapable of further resistance, or to render him unconscious so he is incapable of further reistance. Break something with a joint lock or put him out with a choke.

I continue to wonder on a book of Jiu Jitsu and fight theory. Would such a book be considered? Would it be read? Would it be a work that would affect the art in the same way modernism and post-modernism affected literature? Would the practitioners of Brazilian Jiu Jitsu identify with a work that tried to codify their fighting language, the theories which they unknowingly employed? Would it lead us into a more modern period of Jiu Jitsu and fighting?

Monday, January 18, 2010

Jiu Jitsu as Technology

Think of Brazilian Jiu Jitsu as a technology. Like other technologies, it is a means which has developed, simplified and enlightened human art and endeavor. Also like other technologies, it changes and the old is swept out by newer revisions of the old patterns. Like other technologies, we will look back and see the old theories and ideas as flawed, incorrect, dated. We will constantly see our current iteration as the best form (even if we acknowledge it's only the best so far), the most correct.



Technology is not a straight, one-way arrow. It often braids back, taking an old idea and modifying it for new use.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Jake Shields on American Jiu Jitsu


In an interview with SI after the Robbie Lawler Fight:
"I have a super aggressive style of jiu-jitsu," said the victorious Shields, now 23-4-1. "The old style of jiu-jitsu is just to kick back, relax and wait for things to happen. But I think the wrestling mentality of forcing things and making them happen, called "American jiu-jitsu," a style I made up, is go, go, go."

Monday, November 16, 2009

"Everything has Changed"

Ryan Hall was featured in an article where he displays his superb analytical eye for Jiu Jitsu,

(superb analytical eye despite the fact that he claims he was piss drunk when he gave this interview)

(from lockflow.com/article_view.php?id=4992):

Ryan Hall made his name in the grappling world as a Lloyd Irvin prodigy. Tournament after tournament, match after match, he pulled guard, and by rotating between traditional guard and inverted guard, often-times with monkey-like speed and agility, he would catch his opponent with any one of his 200+ triangle set-ups. It was fancy. It was flashy. And it was winning him tournaments.

“I don’t believe in it anymore,” Hall said.

The techniques and the strategies that were winning him NAGA tournaments and Grappler’s Quest tournaments weren’t effective against elite level competition. Hall said that his old approach to Jiu-Jitsu was fundamentally flawed and that he was only successful with positions like the inverted guard because he often enjoyed a significant skill and knowledge advantage over his opponents, which hid the weaknesses of his game.

Hall likened his experience to what it might be like to play basketball with LeBron James: “He could beat [me], probably, with no hands because not only is he physically better suited for that game, but he’s technically so much better and so much more skilled than [me] that he can do whatever he wants… Just because you can stand on your head and triangle me when you’re really good and I’m not doesn’t make it a good strategy when both of us are at a high level.

“The idea is [that] just by competing at the high level, the only things that will work are the proper movements, where as if I competed at a low level, that’s when you’ll see people taking shots they shouldn’t take, driving the lane when they shouldn’t, making all sorts of strategic and technical mistakes that only work against lesser opposition.”

What movements do work at the highest level?

“Before, I used to roll around and triangle people a whole bunch of times but if the guy was really good, maybe, maybe not,” Hall said. “But now, it’s get on top, pass, mount, choke. Get on top, pass, mount, choke.”

Hall frequently referenced Rubens “Cobrinha” Charles and Roger Gracie as grapplers that he is now seeking to emulate. Gracie, especially, exemplifies the strategy that Hall now believes is best.

“Why is [Gracie] able to go to the mount and cross choke every single person?” Hall asked. “Everyone knows it’s coming, and it’s not a trick, and there’s not even any sort of flash to it. It’s funny: the best way that you know that Roger may not be being entirely honest when he’s asked what makes him so successful is that he’ll tell you, ‘I’m just doing the same thing as everyone else.’ ‘Roger, why won’t you put out an instructional DVD?’ ‘I just use basics.’ ‘I see… so that’s why everyone mounts and cross chokes their opponents into oblivion every time?’ I would argue that there are things that aren’t visually apparent that are very, very different between what he does and what the rest of us do… In my mind it’s not even a question at this point. There is a small, small handful of people doing this, and it’s not some sort magic. I truly believe that they know something that other people don’t that they’re not particularly willing to share. I’ve been trying to figure it out for the last couple years, and I feel like I’m starting to make progress little by little. I’ve gone from not being able to pass the guard to that being the absolute strongest part of my game and the cross choke from mount being my number one finish.”

Being on top is key. According to Hall, the guard, as a strategy, is not effective against elite level competition because it puts the bottom fighter at a major mechanical disadvantage. Because of this, Hall believes that the guard will eventually disappear and be replaced by takedowns and top positioning. That’s not to say that the guard won’t be used in the event that a fighter does end up on bottom, but the days of a fighter immediately pulling half guard will cease to exist.

Hall cited Marcelo Garcia’s guard game as an effective use of the guard position because Garcia uses the guard in the way that a wrestler uses a shot: to get a leg and score a takedown.

“The way Marcelo Garcia plays guard, is, in my opinion, how it should be done,” Hall said. “Your whole job is to pull them off of you and stand up into a single leg. I’m finding more and more that the traditional sweeps don’t really work at the high level, at least not in the way that you normally think of them: you cut me over, and I fall like kaboom right on my back. That doesn’t really happen. It’s like a 20 point touchdown. It just doesn’t usually work like that when both guys are at a truly elite level... I guess I’d say my approach to the guard has changed drastically. It isn’t to pull some whacky sweep or triangle out of my ass anymore. My whole goal is to just make you off balance to the point that you can’t, for a moment, stop me from standing up—and now I finish from a positional advantage. I feel that’s the truly reliable way to do it. You can replicate it against a high-level opponent who knows what you’re doing. That’s when you know you’ve got something.

“People come to me all the time and say, ‘Teach me the inverted guard.” I’ll show them if they really want to know, but I generally prefer not to. Instead, I’ll try to sell them on this: learn how to wrestle a little bit, and I’ll show you how to pass. The guard is an important position, but the purpose of the guard is not so that I can triangle you; the purpose of the guard is so that I can get on top. It’s the proper strategic choice, seeking the mechanical advantage.”

The mechanical advantage: the absolute best option backed by the strongest, most-perfect technique. As Hall has focused on dissecting what makes basic movements like a cross-collar choke from mount most effective, Roger Gracie effective, his perception of how to learn and teach Jiu-Jitsu has changed.

“What I really believe helps me the most is that I try to break Jiu-Jitsu down to a fundamental level and really work to understand what determines success and failure, kind of on a body mechanics level, to really understand that there are correct and incorrect ways to do things,” Hall said. “The idea is that if you can get down to a fundamental level of body mechanics and understanding and you can kind of distill your Jiu-Jitsu down to something that’s very direct, very simple, allowing you to be able to operate on a higher level of efficiency in many, many positions, all positions really, instead of just drilling just one series or just a couple series of moves and becoming very strong [in that particular area] while neglecting other areas.”

The danger of learning a multitude of techniques, Hall said, is that a fighter will only be good at certain positions. When a fighter is dragged away from that position, his comfort zone, he crumbles. Hall’s focus is now on learning fundamental movements and principles that are universal. And he’s seen a difference both in himself and in his students. Even something as seemingly basic as the shrimp, in Hall’s mind, needs to be re-evaluated.

“The reason I don’t shrimp is not that it’s garbage or that it doesn’t work, but there are problems with the way it’s taught,” Hall said. “Say for instance you have side control, and I manage to get an underhook, and I start shrimping away from you. When I’m initially in side control, I’m kind of glued to you and as a result, I’m relatively stable. My feet are wide. My hips are back. When I shrimp, I put my feet together and I scoot and my profile goes from this to this, for a moment, and then I reset.”

At this point, Hall held his hand out with his fingers spread into a square and brought them together into a single cluster to demonstrate what happens when you shrimp.

Hall continued, “And then I go again. I’m pushing you away. Reset. Pushing away, scooting away, reset. The serious problem with the bottom is that you’re not only pinned in place by the person’s weight, but you’re also controlled because the person on top has the ability to move very quickly. You should probably act accordingly.”

What Hall has replaced the shrimp with is what he calls a “trade secret,” a result of high-level, intense analysis that he’s not willing to give away, much in the same way that Roger Gracie is not willing to give away what makes his moves so effective. Unlike Gracie, however, Hall doesn’t call his movements “basic.” They are fundamental, but far from basic. The mechanics at work are actually quite complex and incredibly specific, and they work.

Hall offered this advice: “The whole key is saying, ‘Look. I don’t want to beat regular people. I don’t want to beat guys that are kind of good. I don’t want to beat hobbyists. I don’t want to pull out a sweet highlight reel full of backflips and wacky nonsense.’ You know who has a sweet highlight reel? Roger Gracie. If something doesn’t work against the top 1% of competitors, I don’t want to do it. If you fight for a living and you have a lower standard than that, you have to be out of your mind.”

So, be like Roger Gracie; that’s what Ryan Hall is trying to do.

~from Lockflow.com

Friday, November 13, 2009

At Brown Belt...


Friday, October 30, 2009

The Sweep


----The Sweep----

The day of the XIV US Open of BJJ, I kept picturing a sweep. I'd done the sweep before, but not many times because people rarely go to full standing in closed guard in practice. But it was stuck in my head like a catchy tune.

Before my last match, my teammates pulled me aside and said, "This guy is a Judo black belt. Don't stand up with him, you've got a good guard, pull guard."

I went onto the mat and stood straight up and came at him in a Judo stance and started pretending to grip fight like a Judo player. I wanted to make him feel like I would stand up with him, and when he let me get a grip, jump full guard. Instead, he got a grip on the end of my sleeve and came in from a mile away and threw me with a kata-guruma. I swept him from my back, but as I was coming up to get on top, he stood up. As he stood up, I jumped on him and clung to him. Without a second thought, I twisted back and executed the sweep. Coming on top, he put me in half guard and as he tried to restore his full guard I dropped to the ankle lock and felt it pop as he tapped.


----The Podium----